The cover is just what you might expect from a book on this subject - a photography of male migrants riding on top of a train. A few appear smiling, which is different from typical representations. However, I found this to be quite an overused image for books on migration. I generally feel uncomfortable with book covers that have identifiable faces on them.
I'm interested in the methodology of the author. Mary mentions that the author did fieldwork for over two years and spent time with individuals at all stages of their migration journey. I'm curious about that - did the author first meet her interlocutors at the shelter where she was working? Did she begin in one of the Central American countries she describes? How does this influence the work she produced?
"This would be effectively presented in a documentary or a dramatic film or play." I agree with Mary. However, I wonder how given the subject of this study (male migration, U.S./Mexico border) it can be relayed in a more unexpected form that might go beyond reproducing the popular images of migration.
The purpose of the article seems to be to map the vulnerabilities that individuals make as they migrate to the U.S. through Mexico and Central America so I think some sort of spatial activity involving her interlocutors. For example, by asking them to visually represent their journey and explore their different mappings of danger/vulnerability.
The book is divided into three acts; the Exposition, Rising Action, and Climax. It is meant to resemble a dramatic play that comes with a constantly shifting plot, acted out by thousands of migrants. At the same time, each migrant has his or her own story; Brigden captures their unique experiences along the route, their interactions with other migrants, and their strategies and practices that they develop within this three part “play” to present the information in the fashion that it is experienced.
The sketch says the text is about the cultural impact of the webcam on Trinidadian, focuses specifically on the affordances of the webcam and its implications for human communication
"Miller and Sinanan call their introduction a conclusion. They put forth their claim and use the remaining chapters as evidence for their claim."
The cover shows a picture of two webcams facing each other, evoking the ways that technology is used to connect and communicate. I find it significant that there is no mention of people in the cover image, perhaps highlighting their stance on how ‘all communication is mediated'.
"Miller and Sinanan begin with the theoretical claim that all communication is mediated, and verify that by demonstrating how webcams are just as mediated as in-person communication. They challenge assertions that tech-mediated communication is somehow less human / less authentic."
The sketch proposes both a documentary to "play around with showing the webcam (and how it shapes communication practices) through a camera” and a "shared museum exhibit” to "a live stream between two exhibits at different museums and patrons at one museum can sit and chat with patrons at the partner museum.” These seem compelling and a great way to get participants, particularly lay people who are interested, involved.
